Does ARMA 3 significantly benefit from SSD? We have 2 windows machines, 1 with SSD and the other with HDD. Would moving our ARMA 3 server over to the SSD machine have noticeable improvement?
We haven't launched the server yet, so I wouldn't have anything to compare if we moved it now.
ARMA 3 Disk I/O
- soja
- This is my homepage
- Posts: 2389
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC40BgXanDqOYoVCYFDSTfHA
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 3:20 pm
ARMA 3 Disk I/O
Not a NFO employee
Re: ARMA 3 Disk I/O
It wouldn't benefit enough to have a performance impact. However, any type of database for the server should be on an SSD.
@Kraze^NFo> Juski has a very valid point
@Juski> Got my new signature, thanks!
@Kraze^NFo> Out of context!
@Juski> Doesn't matter!
@Juski> You said I had a valid point! You can't take it back now! It's out there!
@Juski> Got my new signature, thanks!
@Kraze^NFo> Out of context!
@Juski> Doesn't matter!
@Juski> You said I had a valid point! You can't take it back now! It's out there!
-
- This is my homepage
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:20 am
- Location: Cologne, Gemany
- Contact:
Re: ARMA 3 Disk I/O
ArmA 3 usually does not require frequent disk access, as long as the mission author did not include function that need constant compiling - even then, this is fairly OK.
To increase performance, you can try to launch the server with the -enableHT parameter, which will enforce the use of using hyperthreading cores (actually did not have much, if any perfromance inprovment when I tested it, but this may vary from mission to mission and actual server VPS, full dedicated).
To increase performance, you can try to launch the server with the -enableHT parameter, which will enforce the use of using hyperthreading cores (actually did not have much, if any perfromance inprovment when I tested it, but this may vary from mission to mission and actual server VPS, full dedicated).