Dedicated Server typo

[BnD|Sleeper]

I am beginning to consider a Dedicated server and that quad-core Value option looks real nice. Anyways, on the bottom of the page, it says $99 per extra Gigabyte (GB) and I think that is a huge typo. If that's not a typo, no one in their right mind would rent a dedicated server because most places are ~$0.10 (10 CENTS) per GB so maybe that's supposed to be $0.99/GB.

Sleeper

[Edge100x]

That is indeed a typo and thank you for pointing it out. I will have that corrected to read TB.

This hadn't come up yet because nobody had gone over the allotted bandwidth. We don't really expect that to ever happen, either .

[BnD|Sleeper]

That is indeed a typo and thank you for pointing it out. I will have that corrected to read TB.

This hadn't come up yet because nobody had gone over the allotted bandwidth. We don't really expect that to ever happen, either .

In all honesty, if no one has gone over the bandwidth limit and if they probably won't, WHY would you want you rate it as a Terabyte and not per gigabyte because people will see the larger number and not be as comfortable as they would with a smaller cost/size. I think cost/GB is smarter too because seriously, if they go over, they won't go over by 1TB! They will go over by a matter of GB...

If this is supposed to be a ploy to entice people to buy because it seems cheap, I think it will do the opposite; people will see the higher number and logic would and will dictate, the user will think it's a high price to pay .

Sleeper

[Edge100x]

In all honesty, if no one has gone over the bandwidth limit and if they probably won't, WHY would you want you rate it as a Terabyte and not per gigabyte

We could put it as a cost per GB or a cost per TB. It doesn't matter to us and this is a very minor thing that as I said will likely never actually come up, so we just put the simpler and shorter of the two.

if they go over, they won't go over by 1TB!

There's a good chance that if someone goes over he will go over by quite a bit. I say that because the only people going over the standard amount would probably be running high-volume web/file servers.

Since the billing would be fractional, it doesn't matter which way it is put, in terms of the final cost.

If this is supposed to be a ploy to entice people to buy because it seems cheap...

It isn't, no. It's just small print at the bottom that I wouldn't expect anyone to pay much attention to, nor should they.