Ask questions about dedicated servers here and we and other users will do our best to answer them. Please also refer to the self-help section for tutorials and answers to the most commonly asked questions.
flamedog
New to forums
Posts: 13 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC40BgXanDqOYoVCYFDSTfHA
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 4:08 pm
Post
by flamedog » Wed May 09, 2012 4:24 pm
ok first i try'ed -
http://www.nfoservers.com/forums/viewto ... =68&t=5418
and that didnt work so i contacted support and they took me thought the steps and then after that didnt work they sent me here. So the thing is i just bought a new ip so i can have 2 ips for my vps
the probelm is when i go to restart the "networking" (sudo /etc/init.d/networkking restart) i get this error -
http://i.imgur.com/E7lMQ.png
then it shows "[OK]" on then next line then exits to where it says "user@servername: "
my networking config(/etc/network/interface) looks like this
Code: Select all
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address <main ip>
netmask <NetMask>
gateway <main ip gateway>
auto eth0:0
iface eth0:0 inet static
address <second ip>
netmask <NetMask>
gateway <second ip gateway>
paulg1981
A regular
Posts: 37 Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:43 pm
Post
by paulg1981 » Wed May 09, 2012 4:28 pm
The gateway should be the same for both of your ip addresses. It is hard to tell if it is or not from your snippet?
flamedog
New to forums
Posts: 13 Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 4:08 pm
Post
by flamedog » Wed May 09, 2012 4:33 pm
the gateway and the address are the same (the ip from the iptable in account cpanel)
and the netmask set to 255.255.255.0
Vanderburg
Former staff
Posts: 1253 Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:27 am
Location: Dallas, TX
Post
by Vanderburg » Wed May 09, 2012 5:58 pm
The gateway is not always the same. The proper gateway for each IP address will be listed on the IP List tab of your control panel.
flamedog
New to forums
Posts: 13 Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 4:08 pm
Post
by flamedog » Wed May 09, 2012 6:37 pm
Vanderburg wrote: The gateway is not always the same. The proper gateway for each IP address will be listed on the IP List tab of your control panel.
I did not know that but i got the gateway from the tab as with the other ip info
Edge100x
Founder
Posts: 13120 Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 11:04 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:
Post
by Edge100x » Wed May 09, 2012 10:19 pm
Have you also tried rebooting? It looks like Ubuntu is getting confused here and is not taking down the old interface properly.
flamedog
New to forums
Posts: 13 Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 4:08 pm
Post
by flamedog » Thu May 10, 2012 2:49 pm
Edge100x wrote: Have you also tried rebooting? It looks like Ubuntu is getting confused here and is not taking down the old interface properly.
Ive done this and now its stuck on booting up on "Waiting for network config"
EDIT- it seems to have booted up
EDIT EDIT - it seems reinstalling and restoring from backup files worked ^^
Edge100x
Founder
Posts: 13120 Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 11:04 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:
Post
by Edge100x » Thu May 10, 2012 2:53 pm
Out of curiosity, how does the file that our system generated and put on for you differ from the one you created?
flamedog
New to forums
Posts: 13 Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 4:08 pm
Post
by flamedog » Thu May 10, 2012 3:18 pm
Edge100x wrote: Out of curiosity, how does the file that our system generated and put on for you differ from the one you created?
one i had
Code: Select all
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address <main ip>
netmask <NetMask>
gateway <main ip gateway>
auto eth0:0
iface eth0:0 inet static
address <second ip>
netmask <NetMask>
gateway <second ip gateway>
auto gen'ed one
Code: Select all
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address <main ip>
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway <main ip gateway>
dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
auto eth0:1
iface eth0:1 inet static
address <second ip>
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway <second ip gateway>
Edge100x
Founder
Posts: 13120 Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 11:04 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:
Post
by Edge100x » Thu May 10, 2012 4:13 pm
It's possible that it requires it start with :1, then, which is something new, if so. It looks like you also may have accidentally removed the dns-nameservers bit with yours.
Vanderburg
Former staff
Posts: 1253 Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:27 am
Location: Dallas, TX
Post
by Vanderburg » Thu May 10, 2012 5:48 pm
It's an index, so I don't see why starting with :0 is a problem. I'd also guess that it was the DNS servers.