Yes, if the core speed were much higher, that would help. But, it won't be; they get that many cores by running them at very low speeds, in order to reduce power consumption and heat generation. They just can't run them faster and still fit that many on a die.
None of the games we run is very multithreaded, from what I've seen. I haven't seen much data on MW3.
Geek corner: Intels 50 core CPU?
-
Edge100x
- Founder
- Posts: 13129
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC40BgXanDqOYoVCYFDSTfHA
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 11:04 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
-
rustydusty1717
- This is my homepage
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:15 pm
Re: Geek corner: Intels 50 core CPU?
Just briefly looking at a few of mine, looks as if MW3 will benefit from atleast 2 cores. Others seem to be parked for the most part. Having a heck of a time with ports though. If I'm running a CS server at the same time, even on say port 27030, it will try and use a different port.
Re: Geek corner: Intels 50 core CPU?
Give me 4.0ghz and I'll host NFo.kraze wrote:lol...
What would you do with 50 cores?
Re: Geek corner: Intels 50 core CPU?
IcEWoLF wrote:Give me 4.0ghz and I'll host NFo.kraze wrote:lol...
What would you do with 50 cores?
3.9 and we'll call it even.
@Kraze^NFo> Juski has a very valid point
@Juski> Got my new signature, thanks!
@Kraze^NFo> Out of context!
@Juski> Doesn't matter!
@Juski> You said I had a valid point! You can't take it back now! It's out there!
@Juski> Got my new signature, thanks!
@Kraze^NFo> Out of context!
@Juski> Doesn't matter!
@Juski> You said I had a valid point! You can't take it back now! It's out there!